Milwaukee, WI - Jan. 24, 2024: One of the executive orders, issued by Trump on January 21, 2025, aim to eliminate race- and sex-based discrimination, emphasizing merit-based opportunities and enforcing longstanding federal civil rights laws.
It critiques diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as discriminatory and counter to American values of individual achievement and hard work. Key actions include:
Revoking Executive Orders and Policies: This includes orders promoting DEI in federal workplaces and contracting, such as Executive Orders 12898, 13583, 13672, and 11246. Agencies must terminate discriminatory preferences, mandates, and programs.
Streamlining Federal Contracting: Federal contractors must comply with anti-discrimination laws without considering race, color, sex, or national origin. Affirmative action and workforce balancing are prohibited.
Private Sector Oversight: Federal agencies, with the Attorney General, are tasked with encouraging the private sector to end illegal DEI discrimination. A strategic enforcement plan will identify key sectors and discriminatory entities for investigations or lawsuits.
Educational Guidance: The Attorney General and Secretary of Education must issue guidance to educational institutions to ensure compliance with the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against race-conscious admissions.
Exceptions and Limitations: Preferences for veterans and those under the Randolph-Sheppard Act are preserved. First Amendment rights and academic freedom are not restricted.
The order emphasizes civil rights law enforcement, individual merit, and reducing DEI-driven practices deemed discriminatory. Nonetheless, the executive order could have significant implications for African Americans, both positive and negative, depending on how it is implemented and interpreted. Here are the potential impacts:
Negative Impacts
Elimination of DEI Programs:
Many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in federal agencies, corporations, and educational institutions aimed at addressing systemic inequalities may be dismantled. This could further reduce opportunities specifically designed to uplift African Americans who have historically faced discrimination.
Programs promoting workforce diversity or minority-focused initiatives in contracting and education could completely disappear, potentially narrowing pathways for African Americans in industries where they are underrepresented.
Reduced Access to Federal Contracts:
The elimination of affirmative action in federal contracting may remove opportunities for African American-owned businesses, as race and ethnicity can no longer be factors in awarding contracts.
Higher Education Admissions:
The order directs federal oversight to enforce the Supreme Court's ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which limits race-conscious admissions. This could further restrict the ability of African American students to benefit from holistic admissions processes designed to improve campus diversity.
Potential Increase in Discrimination:
The removal of DEI initiatives may unintentionally allow discriminatory practices to go unchecked, as fewer mechanisms will exist to proactively address racial disparities in workplaces and institutions.
Positive Impacts
Merit-Based Opportunities:
African Americans excelling on merit may gain more recognition in a system that focuses solely on individual achievement without race-based considerations.
Focus on Civil Rights Enforcement:
The order emphasizes enforcement of civil rights laws, which could benefit African Americans if agencies actively combat illegal discrimination based on race.
Streamlined Federal Processes:
Streamlining federal contracting and compliance may make it easier for African American entrepreneurs to navigate federal systems, provided they meet the qualifications.
Broader Concerns
Critics argue that dismantling DEI programs could reverse progress made in addressing systemic barriers faced by African Americans in employment, education, and business. Supporters believe the focus on merit and the enforcement of civil rights laws could create a more equitable system by eliminating what they view as preferential treatment. However, the delusions of merit amidst the extreme decline in United State's educational institutions may not yield the intended results.
Conclusion
The overall impact will depend on how the executive order is implemented and whether complementary efforts are made to ensure the protection of African Americans' civil rights and equitable access to opportunities. While the order aims to promote equality through merit, it may disproportionately affect African Americans by removing initiatives designed to address historical and systemic inequities.
Comments